In four years, his administration will have ended “and Cuba, socialist Cuba, will be here,” says Fernández de Cossío

EFE (via 14ymedio), Madrid, 17 December 2024 — The Government of Cuba denied this Tuesday that it is uncomfortable with the political rapprochement with the United States – which will be 10 years old this December 17 – and acknowledged that it is “concerned” about the economic effect that a second Trump term may have.
“Of course we are concerned about the effect that this can have on our economy and, in particular, the effect that greater US hostility can have on the population’s standard of living, which has proven to be powerful and has a very effective destructive capacity to cause damage,” said Cuban Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs, Carlos Fernández de Cossío.
These statements were made within the framework of the dialogue forum on relations between Havana and Washington, on the occasion of the tenth anniversary of the so-called thaw.
Fernández de Cossío also stated that the most catastrophic scenarios for Cuba that are being outlined following Trump’s election are those desired by the Cuban population in Florida, but he considered that “it can’t be of interest to the North American nation as a whole” that an increase in instability and violence on the Island materializes. continue reading
“It can’t be of interest to the North American nation as a whole” that an increase in instability and violence on the Island materializes
Despite those omens, he was convinced that the regime will resist a new Trump presidency. “We know we’re going to be able to survive. In four years, the Trump government will have ended, and Cuba, socialist Cuba, will be here,” Fernández de Cossío said.
Moments before, in the dialogue forum, the deputy minister acknowledged that these next four years may not be easy for the country, which has been plunged into a serious economic and energy crisis for years.
Regarding the outgoing US president, he regretted that Biden has maintained the bulk of the sanctions imposed by his predecessor and that he did not remove Cuba from the list of countries sponsoring terrorism.
“The United States knows that Cuba does not sponsor terrorism. But it also knows perfectly well the damage it is capable of causing by keeping Cuba on the list, and that is the purpose it has pursued,” he said.
In addition, the deputy minister denied that the regime felt uncomfortable with the approach advocated by the administration of former US President Barack Obama (2009-2017), which led to the thaw, as pointed out in an interview with EFE by the then-US ambassador to Havana, Jeffrey DeLaurentis.
“Cuba fulfilled all the commitments it made, since our goal was to advance. The U.S. government violated almost all of them. So it is very difficult to say that Cuba was uncomfortable with the thaw,” he argued.
“Cuba fulfilled all the commitments it made, since our goal was to advance”
The vice-chancellor added that “the euphoria” that existed in the country, “the support that there was from our people and the willingness we had to move forward, even with the permanence of the economic blockade* – let’s remember that it wasn’t lifted – is more than a reliable demonstration that Cuba had the disposition and the will to move forward.”
Previously, when speaking at the dialogue forum, he maintained that “the brief rapprochement was positive for Cuba and the United States, and it aroused the respect, congratulations and admiration of many of the world governments.”
However, he pointed out that Washington failed to comply with “practically all” the commitments it reached with Cuba (while Havana kept “every one”) and stressed that, since the arrival of Castroism on the Island, “what has prevailed” on the part of the United States “has been aggression.”
“In this difficult relationship there is an aggressor country and an attacked country,” said the deputy minister, who also spoke of a “difficult coexistence” and said that Cuba will continue to be “consistent” in its position of seeking cooperation and understanding with Washington.
Translated by Regina Anavy
*Editor’s note: There is, in fact, no US ‘blockade’ on Cuba, but this continues to be the term the Cuban government prefers to apply to the ongoing US embargo. During the Cuban Missile Crisis the US ordered a Naval blockade (which it called a ‘quarantine’) on Cuba in 1962, between 22 October and 20 November of that year. The blockade was lifted when Russia agreed to remove its nuclear missiles from the Island. The embargo had been imposed earlier in February of the same year, and although modified from time to time, it is still in force.
____________
COLLABORATE WITH OUR WORK: The 14ymedio team is committed to practicing serious journalism that reflects Cuba’s reality in all its depth. Thank you for joining us on this long journey. We invite you to continue supporting us by becoming a member of 14ymedio now. Together we can continue transforming journalism in Cuba.