The state-run ‘Cubadebate’ describes certain media outlets as part of the “propaganda apparatus” serving the Trump Administration

14ymedio, Madrid, May 19, 2026 — The new U.S. sanctions have no practical effect on those targeted, Miguel Díaz-Canel mocked in a post published early Tuesday morning. “Among the leadership of our Party, State, Government, and military institutions, no one has assets or property to protect under U.S. jurisdiction. The U.S. Government knows this perfectly well,” the Cuban leader emphasized on his X account.
In his view, this is so clear that “there is not even any evidence to present,” but “the anti-Cuban rhetoric of hatred tries to make people believe such evidence exists in order to justify the escalation of its total economic war,” Díaz-Canel said. The Cuban president thus downplayed the new measure by the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (Ofac), which on Monday added eleven senior political and military officials from the Island to its sanctions list, including three ministers.
The leader believes that the decision, since it has no real implications, is instead part of a series of measures aimed at increasing pressure on the authorities through threats against third parties. “The executive order that persecutes and threatens third parties wishing to sell fuel to Cuba, and that extraterritorializes the embargo to unprecedented levels, penalizing companies that want to invest in Cuba or simply provide us with basic goods such as food, medicine, hygiene products, or others, is immoral, illegal, and criminal,” he added.
“The executive order that persecutes and threatens third parties wishing to sell fuel to Cuba, and that extraterritorializes the embargo to unprecedented levels, penalizing companies that want to invest in Cuba is immoral, illegal and criminal”
Díaz-Canel states that his Government will continue “denouncing, in the strongest and most forceful way, the genocidal siege that seeks to strangle our people,” who are being subjected to an “act of genocide that must be condemned by international organizations,” while also calling for its “promoters” to be prosecuted “criminally.”
That denunciation campaign is consistently carried out by Cubadebate, which for weeks has lamented that U.S. media outlets echo leaks as another element of pressure on the regime. This Tuesday, in one of the digital outlet’s increasingly frequent analyses of the role of the press, it focused on publications by Axios, which since February has been leaking information from State Department sources: from the secret talks revealed in February — and admitted by the Cuban Government a month later — to the most recent reports from this very weekend about the alleged purchase of drones, without overlooking the visit of CIA director John Ratcliffe to Havana.
Cubadebate believes that Axios helps shift the debate from the political to the military sphere, so that “the narrative no longer revolves around dialogue between States, but around communication directed toward those whom the U.S. considers the ‘real power.’” The state-run outlet analyzed, using the Zeeschuimer tool (for data capture), the 1,642 reactions generated on social media by the latest Axios article and concluded that they fall into several groups. The largest group sees the U.S. outlet as a “State propaganda apparatus,” accounting for 32% of comments.
They are followed by those expressing distrust toward the Trump Administration, with 26%; those who believe Cuba is the true party under threat and has the right to defend itself, 22%; those who think the groundwork is being laid for an attack on the Island, 12%; and, as a minority group at 8%, those who fear Cuba may indeed pose a threat. Cubadebate admits that comments may sometimes contain one or several premises and that these are not mutually exclusive, although it does not mention that a common trend on social media is to respond critically to what one dislikes and justify it, while support tends to be more passive and limited to a simple “like.”
Be that as it may, the scenario in Cuba is so open and generates so much debate that articles in the U.S. press appear almost daily, although none can determine what will happen. This Monday, Politico published a column by correspondent Nahal Toosi, of Iranian origin and an expert in international relations, in which the reporter argues that the idea of a military attack on the Island is now more likely than months ago, since the Trump Administration sees no progress in a sanctions strategy it had considered capable of producing quick results.
“The initial idea regarding Cuba was that the leadership was weak and that the combination of intensified sanctions enforcement, an oil blockade, and U.S. military victories in Venezuela and Iran would scare Cubans into making a deal. Now, the Iran situation has gone off course and the Cubans are proving much tougher than initially thought. So military action is more on the table than before,” said one official involved in the discussions.
Toosi’s source maintains that the Cuban regime is more monolithic than expected and not even aware of the severity of the economic situation. “They respond to U.S. pressure by offering ideas such as allowing foreign investment in hotels when their real problems are structural, including their crumbling electrical grid,” the source emphasized.
The correspondent also states that Trump might gain little domestically from such a move, since the strongest enthusiasts of military action are already among his supporters
Although the Pentagon continues drafting possible plans, nothing has been decided. A former White House official with extensive knowledge of Cuba warned that the popular support the regime may still retain should not be underestimated and that things may not be so simple. “There are true believers there,” he said. The correspondent also notes that Trump might gain little domestically from such a move, since the strongest supporters of military action are already among his base. Nevertheless, the pressure continues unabated, as reflected in the constant stream of related news.
The situation will continue tomorrow, when the formal indictment against Raúl Castro for the 1996 shootdown of the Brothers to the Rescue planes is expected to be announced. This Monday, the U.S.-Cuba Trade and Economic Council published a report examining possible scenarios arising from the situation, highlighting its firm conviction that Castro will not be arrested, unlike what occurred with Nicolás Maduro in Venezuela.
“The United States Department of Defense will not carry out an operation to extract Raúl Castro from the Republic of Cuba,” they state, adding that the most likely outcome is that the general will die at home. “The Trump-Vance Administration will not condition Cuba’s commercial, economic, financial, military, political, and social reintegration on the extradition of Raúl Castro. They will request it, but they will not enforce it. Therefore, the indictment will be performative,” the document adds. In summary, Washington continues to prioritize psychological warfare.
Translated by Regina Anavy
______________________
COLLABORATE WITH OUR WORK: The 14ymedio team is committed to practicing serious journalism that reflects Cuba’s reality in all its depth. Thank you for joining us on this long journey. We invite you to continue supporting us by becoming a member of 14ymedio now. Together we can continue transforming journalism in Cuba.























