Walesa: Counsel and Realities / Miriam Celaya

1362008912_lech-walesa0_1_1467669cLast February 6th a note was posted on the digital space Cubanet regarding a TV Martí interview with Lech Walesa, the renowned Polish trade union leader and undisputed trailblazer of the democratic transition in his country, during his recent visit to Miami. This note summarizes some thoughts Walesa put forth apropos freedom in Cuba and the role of the internal opposition on the island, which has caused mixed reactions among some members of Cuban dissident groups.

Overall, we may or may not be in agreement with Walesa’s opinions, but I don’t think that his interests were particularly directed at mocking the dissidents. This is not an exceptional event either: with regard to the review of the situation in Cuba we know that from time to time someone appears who “knows” better than we do what must be done to end the dictatorship. Interestingly, that someone is seldom a Cuban.

But the matter comes up repeatedly, and this case brings with it other lessons, since the person rendering opinions is a recognized international leader, which implies that he enjoys the self-assurance of authority, in virtue of which his opinions may be assumed by others as absolute truths, or, at least, accepted as priori judgments. continue reading

That is why, at the risk of upsetting those who worship the sacred cows of politics and, at the same time, favoring my admiration and respect for Walesa’s extraordinary merits and leadership in the democratic transition of his country, I want to go over his words and discuss them on a personal level. I’m barely one among the thousands of Cubans who nurture independent civic organizations in Cuba, but every citizen is a political subject -even those who are not aware of it- and each individual’s opinion is worth, at least, as much as that of the most prominent leaders.

I do not think, however, that Walesa’s role in Poland’s recent history turn him into a de facto “expert opinion” to assess the Cuban case. In fact, his opinions display great ignorance about Cuba’s situation, about the nature of totalitarian power and about our history and idiosyncrasy.

I seem to feel a certain degree of arrogance, or perhaps a tad personal vanity in the phrase “I tried to give advice to the Cuban opposition but, for some reason, they won’t listen to me”. Without wishing to dismiss the value of Walesa’s political experience, I am not aware that anyone, in the name of the opposition here, has asked him for advice. His position is, as it were, the authoritarian father’s punishment towards a misbehaving child who does not follow the rules, and I must confess that -far from bothering me as a member of the Cuban opposition- at first I thought it even funny: Democratic Cuban colleagues, let’s not toil any more in our long resistance against the regime, we only have to follow Walesa’s advice!

Having said that, in a debate mode, I would like to know how the Polish leader could have commanded such a powerful syndicate as Solidarity in Cuba; a country in which the very government took it upon itself to terminate almost to the core the port movement, plus swept off all which once was industry. Mr. Walesa seems to have no idea that there are no laborers on this Island, only those who survive in the few sugar mills or in the very few shops or factories that have withstood the destructive power of the regime. We don’t have great trade to encourage the existence of port syndicate activity. We can’t begin to compare Casablanca, the modest shipyard in Havana bay with the gigantic complex of shipyards in Gdansk, with thousands of workers, the critical main stage of the Polish transition. Cubans don’t even have a merchant or fishing fleet.

There are only minor vestiges remaining in Cuba of those great cigar factories that were the cradle and the kiln of Cuban syndicalism between the end of the XIX and the beginning of the XX century. How could labor unionism and a labor leader exist in a country without a labor force where the government lays off 20% of the active labor force without a second thought? And we are not just talking about unions: here, even mere free association is taboo, because, while Cubans have not historically been strong carriers of civic traditions, the Castro dictatorship undertook to void any possibility of social autonomy from the first years following the seizure of power in 1959.

It seems unreasonable to move mimetically the experiences of a process of transition from one nation to another. The Cuban situation is neither better nor worse than that of Poland at that moment. It is simply different. It’s enough to remember that in the political arena, the Polish opposition was able to count on the firm support of such an ionic figure as that of Karol Jozef Wojtyla, Pope John Paul II, and the Catholic faith constituted a unifying element of the spirit of the Polish people towards democracy, which –coupled with a long tradition of struggle for independence and a solid civic culture- contributed decisively to the opposition’s victory. The struggle, in addition, not only went against a puppet government, but ultimately against a foreign power, the Soviet Union, at a time when the tensions of the Cold War were being undermined by the collapse of the East European communist models. So, at the end of the decade of the 80’s all factors came together which, taken together, led to the transition to democracy not only in Poland but in all the countries of the former socialist bloc.

Cuba, on the other hand, shows a very different scenario, though there are common elements in our circumstances of transition, such as the existence of a regime calling itself “communist” and a centralized power that controls the economy, the politics, the military, the enforcement agencies and the social structures. The fight is against a national dictatorship that has gone through several phases over half a century, including satellite status of that same Soviet power.

For its part, the Cuban Catholic Church is far from having a close relationship with most of society, but we must recognize the (local) civic community work of many priests in many parishes. We need to understand that we Cubans, in general, are not very zealous in matters of faith, and that the best known national paradigm of spiritual unity, José Martí, has been widely manipulated and quasi-prostituted from all ideologies and interests. As for the leadership of the religious institution, it is a very distant elite, very far from the politics of change that are evolving from independent civil society and the opposition. We have a Church of spiritual formalities not truly committed to the struggle of resistance. In fact, its tendency has been to fold under the power of the ruling autocracy.

I don’t think it’s a problem that there are “too many leaders within the opposition” in Cuba and no one among them who is “strong enough” to lead all of us. Actually, I think the variety of ideas and projects that exists suggests the possibility that one day we will have to choose among many proposals. Variety does not necessarily mean “disunity”, as shown by the trend of mutual support that has been occurring in recent years between different projects and teams. Perhaps the diversity -not “disunity”- is precisely the most practical and possible strategy in a country where power has cornered every area of society, including families.

Thus, operating as small cells and concurring on greater common endeavors, dissidence is uniting to meet the changes of the Cuban transition. Today we perceive many open fronts of the civil resistance inside Cuba that include both so-called traditional opposition parties, such as the independent press in all its forms and multiple civil society projects, which have demonstrated they are capable of collaborating with each other and of promoting common approaches, regardless of their ideologies. If that process is ever consolidated, or if it succeeds, the future will tell, but, at any rate, the variety of the Cuban opposition spectrum, far from making me worry, seems to me like a reflection of democracy in its midst, an idea which is shared by many representatives of the dissidence. At any rate, magnifying the advantages of what it insistently being called a “union” is as harmful to the opposition as it is opportune to the dictatorship.

We don’t need to found a monolithic union around a “powerful” single leader in order to reach democracy in Cuba (we have had too much of that in the last 54 years). In any case, the power of the Cuban dictatorship has been so complete that any action that appears will constitute an important factor to undermine the system without necessarily having to be subordinated to a particular leader. Experience shows that the power of a leader lies not only in his ability to summon, but in a combination of many factors, among which, his capacity to act is essential. Today, the actions of several local and regional opposition organizations are showing both their ability to fight and the summoning power of their leaders.

Another one of Walesa’s statements demonstrating his ignorance of the Cuban situation is one in which he said that “in cities and towns and people should have offered to fill new positions, new duties already, in the transformed situation. In two years, there will be democratic elections (in Cuba)… we have to be prepared, because what will happen after the fall of the Castro regime will be chaos”.

I would dare say that in almost every city and town in Cuba social actors do exist who will play an important role in the zero hour, i.e., at the moment of time of the definitive changes, and, at every instance, there will be many more. The government’s inability to overcome the structural crisis of the system is, paradoxically, the main source of the general desire for change. Certainly, the Cuban transition has already begun and the system began in a process of erosion years ago that has been accentuating gradually, but permanently. However, reality still has not been processed to the point that it is possible to occupy the posts of local governments and participate in decision-making from legal structures that are strategically designed to avoid such an occurrence. Maybe not even our changes will take place that way.

No one knows if in just two years there will be democratic elections in Cuba, though I hope so. But I can assure Walesa that, by then, there will be more Cubans, today’s opposition and citizens of that near tomorrow, who will be prepared to meet the challenges of democracy after more than half a century of totalitarianism. We are striving for that.

Personally, I appreciate the good wishes for our country’s freedom expressed by the Polish trade union leader, but he really does us a disservice when lending himself to coin such a cliché. I also reject the dire predictions of social catastrophism: there will be no such chaos in Cuba because, at that moment, above all our differences and reservations, the love for our nation will be asserted among us, the will to rebuild on the ruins and the experience gained by several generations during long years of struggle, to finally found institutions that will prevent the return of a dictatorship. Believe me, Mr. Walesa, on these pillars will be born a most enduring union, not of the opposition, but of all Cubans.

Miriam Celaya

Translated by Norma Whiting

(Article originally published in Cubanet on February 22, 2013)

February 27 2013

Barcenas, Conspirator in a Melodrama? / Miguel Iturria Savon

Two of my independent journalism colleagues asked me from Havana about corruption in Spain and in particular the cases of Iñaki Urdangarin, son-in-law of King Juan Carlos, and Luis Barcenas, former treasurer of the Peoples Party and former senator from that political group, which seems to be in jeopardy after the discovery of their Swiss bank accounts.

Both colleagues explain to me that the official press in Cuba is highlighting the Barcenas case as a symbol of corruption of the governing party which, according to them, shows the cynicism of the Island mandarins, who have spread corruption and poverty as a way of life and their domination over the island they alone have governed since 1959.

As I already said to these friends, I just said that Barcenas and Urdangarin are two examples of a phenomenon that comes from Spain’s past and seems to multiply with the economic, social and ethical crisis. In the area of the politics of budget cuts, the millions of unemployed, the public protests and the expressions of uncertainty aired in the press to report with precision the more than 200 directors processed by the courts for defrauding their electors in four districts in the country. At bottom there are the structural problems that threaten democracy and the need for reforms to lead the nation toward a state of social well-being.

They are investigating the King’s son-in-law for appropriating money obtained from promoting sporting events in Palma de Mallorca. Luis Barcenas, who admitted having 38 million euros in Switzerland, on charges of bribery, tax evasion, and defrauding the public treasury. The judge is looking for the origin of so much money and the patronage implications of this conspirator in a melodrama that, along with stealing from the party, is in the public eye.

I made it clear to my friends that Spain has problems and is a difficult country to govern, like others in the European Mediterranean basin. In Spain, however, they air their dirty laundry and expose the politicians who forget their commitments to the voters and focus on their personal enrichment. Luis Barcenas, alias “the bastard,” is one example.

March 4 2013

Angel Santiesteban Prats: Prison Diary 1 / Angel Santiesteban

Carta desde la prisionThe writer Angel Santiesteban-Prats is now in La Lima prison, located in Guanabacoa. He was transferred there on Saturday after spending a day in Valle Grande prison where he wrote this post, the first that we have from him in his captivity.

Each and every one of the posts he writes we will publish here in his blog “The Children Nobody Wanted.”

Behind Bars

Finally, the Cuban government has me behind bars. After 4 years of an arbitrary “legal process” where they have violated the most basic rules of the legal system and I have faced multiple charges, all of them with the clear intention of degrading my image before public opinion, and so my process will serve to intimidate Cuban writers and artists and I will close my blog, “The Children Nobody Wanted,” with which I’ve reached the light, that once possessed is irreversible.

Despite the suffering and the pain it has caused, especially for my family, I feel proud of being in the place where so many good Cubans have ended up.

From here I will try to write my posts and fulfill my modest role in achieving a democratic opening in Cuba, I will continue my struggle and resistance to the totalitarian regime. I’m just a citizen who decided to take off the mask and expose the truth of my country as as far as I can, in writing.

Now I find myself surrounded by men who committed various crimes but complain of racism, beatings and social injustices. When they hear that Cuba will soon change their eyes light up.

Other inmates have had the term ’’dangerousness*’’ applied to them, a supposedly legal term in our country. Individuals are sanctioned in advance, on suspicion that they might commit some illegality; the majority of them are black and do not have State jobs.

Today begins a new stage in my life and the path I have chosen. The hope of Cubans, their persistence in the fight will bring the change needed to become a prosperous and democratic state.

Without more from my “tall and slanted” handwriting I send you my hugs and thanks for all who have shown their solidarity and support for the cause.

From Valle Grande prison, 1 March 2013

Ángel Santiesteban Prats

*Translator’s note: The Cuban Penal Code recognizes the crime of “pre-criminal dangerousness” which carries a sentence of 1-4 years. The “crime” is the potential to commit a crime, not actually having committed one.

March 5 2013

Yoani Sanchez: A Cuban Hurricane in Brazil (4) / Jorge Hernandez Fonseca

The impact of the attacks Yoani, victorious against the “demons” paid by the Cuban Embassy in the Brazilian capital, have become something of a legend in Brazil. After the Cuban blogger’s brilliant presentation, and a standing ovation, the next day there was a program in the city of Salvador, the capital of Bahia state.

However, before going to the university auditorium Tuesday night, the 19th, there was a phone call from the Brazilian documentary filmmaker Dado Galvão, inviting Yoani “and her entourage” to visit National Congress (it was an invitation from the Federal Deputy Otavio Leite in coordination with Senator Eduardo Suplicy) for which we were sent the corresponding plane tickets.

As we had planned some sightseeing in Salvador, this invitation forced a change of plans, with the Wednesday, February 20th program being to “visit to the Brazilian Parliament, in Brasilia.”

The Salvador-Brasilia flight would leave around noon, which gave Yoani the chance to have another informal session of interviews that morning in “Feria de Santana,” in the hotel lobby where we were staying. Our hotel was also occupied by many of the journalists who were accompanying us everywhere, which facilitated, for example, privileged coverage of the previous day’s lunch, in a typical Bahia restaurant to which we directed our little bus, also filled with our journalist friends.

When people in the restaurant recognized Yoani there was a kind of flocking to her, to take photos, hug, apologize for the actions of the “bad Brazilians.”  The owner of the place brought his wife and daughter for the requisite photo and sang, on a small stage, traditional music in honor of Yoani and in addition, obliged the Cuban to dance with him, which Yoani originally declined, “I’m Cuban, but not a dancer,” she said. It seemed he was partnering a “Madonna” or a “Micheal Jackson” rather than a young brave Cuban blogger.

After breakfast in the hotel (with the obligatory photos of Yoani with its employees and their families) we traveled toward Salvador in the same minibus we used the entire time in Bahia. There were no demonstrators because the program has been changed to go to Brasilia. What we experienced at the airport was repeated at every appearance by the Cuban in previously unannounced places: great solidarity, photos, hugs, especially from women, who immediately sympathized with that fragile figure, smiling even in the midst of the greatest adversity.

At the entrance to the airport I separated from the committee to go with the “Feria de Santana” organizers to arrange the formalities for sending our bags and checking in at the airline offices and getting the luggage tags. All this was done at great speed, because “they were the belongings of the Cuban blogger.”

Despite my being delayed with the paperwork, when I entered the domestic flight area, Yoani hadn’t even made it half the distance. Everyone wanted a photo, a hug, to offer words of support, repeating, “I’m sorry Yoani, they don’t represent the Brazilian people.” We embarked for the main center of Brazil’s political power.

We got to Brasilia in the early afternoon. At the airport waiting for us was Deputy Otavio Leite, Representative to the Federal Chamber from the state of Rio de Janeiro, (and the classic battalion of journalists), with some of the deputy’s aides who immediately took care of our luggage. Without the presence of demonstrators we took another minibus, between hugs and photos of Yoani with those who were there.

From the airport we were taken directly to the formidable National Congress building, with police cars in front and behind us. Along the way Yoani was taking photos of the grandeur of Brasilia, the Avenue of the Ministries, its gorgeous Cathedral, the Supreme Court of Justice building, the Planalto (presidential) Palace, until we pulled into the emblematic building of the  Brazilian Parliament.

A multitude of parliamentarians, journalists, deputies and senators, who pressed in wanting to see her, photograph her, talk with her, the principal leaders of the National Congress. The path between the minibus and the Great Hall of Parliament (at that time in parliamentary session), was agonizing. A human current pressing on Yoani, pushing her through those corridors.  We couldn’t have walked on our own feet, that special “political” human mass carried us in the direction of the Session Room.

Behind me I heard one of the security officers surrounding us say to one of his companions, “I haven’t seen this in Congress even on the day Fidel visited us.” In reality, there was a large presence of security agents, but useless, because inside the building there are only deputies and senators along with their aides, and all of them wanted a simple photo with the Cuban.

The crowd that led Yoani entered the Great Hall of the Chamber of Deputies — in session at the time — interrupted by the crowd. Yoani was led by Deputy Leite to the main dais, where the blogger greeted and hugged everyone at the table. The journalists’ flashes didn’t stop recording images. A Leftist deputy, who had the floor at the moment of the “Cuban hurricane in Brazil’s” eruption into the room mounted a lukewarm protest at having been interrupted “outside the rules,” and was immediately silenced by several by various parliamentarians present at the session, asking for “a little education before such a distinguished visitor.” From the Main Chamber we went to the room of the Foreign Relations Committee, where Yoani was received by prolonged applause from the parliamentarians present. A complete symbol: the informal representative of the Cuban opposition received a standing ovation in the Parliament of the largest country in Latin America, by deputies and senators from the most diverse parties, all democratically elected.

Yoani was placed at the center of the table from which the meeting was chaired. I situated myself strategically, just behind the blogger. To the right of the special guest was Deputy Leite, who chaired the session; on her left would sit, for a brief moment, the principal leaders of the Brazilian parliament who took turns occupying the seat and embracing and congratulating the blogger, constantly telling Yoani to look in one direction (where the photographer was) for the precious photo. Senator Suplicy belatedly came and stood at the far right of the table, greeting Yoani from afar with a wave. The session started, but for Yoani, besides having to pay attention to what was being said (it was my responsibility to alert her if something important was said), for our Cuban the whole session was a parade of senators and deputies coming to her from behind the table and placing themselves on one side; hugging her and pulling her into the corresponding photo.

At the beginning of the session of Congress to welcome Yoani, we heard the cries and slogans of the demonstrators sent by the Cuban embassy. In this case, we could hear them at a distant, muffled by the wall separating the Congressional hall from the outside, where protesters from the Cuban embassy were held at bay by security agents. At one point in the session, apparently some of those sent by the Cuban ambassador managed to get to the door of the room (we noticed a movement of journalists covering the event, who focused their cameras in the direction of the front door) but they failed to enter the room to interrupt the session, as they probably intended, “to not let her talk.”

Deputy Leite gave a brief introduction of Yoani and immediately gave the floor to the “Cuban blogger Yoani Sanchez.” Yoani said little, as befits an illustrious guest of Congress. She made no political references to Cuba or Brazil. She spoke as “a simple citizen,” referred to her blog, her work, spoke of her hopes as an activist for freedom of the press as a right of all free men of the world, and very quickly finished her speech, which led to the most dissimilar interventions top Brazilian legislators. There were many requests for the floor. The hosting deputy, Otavio Leite, before passing the floor to the deputies, presented them to Yoani, pointing out the main party leaders present at the meeting, and their party affiliation. There were parliamentarians of all parties, after which the audience had the floor. The interventions, rather than questions, were speeches of welcome and were filled with praise of the blogger’s work, many apologized for the verbal attacks that had been made, one of them even said something like: “we are in presence of the future president of a democratic Cuba”…

Standing behind Yoani I whispered in her ear, “Did you understand what he said.” Yoani had learned a little Portuguese and answered me, turning her worried face–as a sign that something complicated could happen–and looking at me said, “Yes, I understood.” Many of the interventions were not questions to the blogger, but rather words of welcome to Brazil as well as gratitude for her visit to Congress.

After the words of the parliamentarian who called her “future president” a deputy from the left took the floor. He was a member of one of the most far-left parties of the local political spectrum. The deputy censured the words of the deputy who preceded him, expressing that such phrases could “occasion unnecessary problems for Yoani,” that she at no time had suggested such a thing–he said–and what’s more, “Brazil has diplomatic relations with Havana and that phrase could mean a request for explanations to Congress.” The deputy asked Yoani four questions of “concern” to the Brazilian left which did not agree with the “acts of repudiation” organized by the Cuban embassy against Yoani: first, her position on the embargo; second, her opinion on the Guantanamo prison; third, her opinion on “the 5”; and fourth, the source of the funding for her trip. Yoani took the microphone to respond.

Yoani said what she had been repeating since coming to Brazil, but this time, it was to the “upper crust” of Brazilian politics and she targeted and deepened her points of view. She talked about the three reasons she considers the basis for wanting to lift the embargo; she talked about the American Naval base not being a Cuban problem and that activists in the United States are fighting to close it; about “the 5 members of the Ministry of the Interior” she expounded explaining they weren’t 5 but 14, that 9 had made agreements with the U.S. attorney’s office, accepting the allegations and implicating the five convicted, so no one was innocent, following which she added an ironic phrase, which was later debated by the exile in Miami.

Yoani said something like: “For me, they could be released, thereby saving Cuba the huge amount of monetary resources spent on the island for propaganda, both in Cuba and abroad, because there are many needs on the island, we are lacking many things.” It was not a “request for them to release the 5 members of the Interior Ministry,” it was an ironic comment, unhappily for the opponents in Miami, of course, for which Yoani later had to apologize.

With regards to the financing of her trip she explained the sources, already detailed in numerous public appearances. While Yoani spoke, the deputy who had posed the question–in a friendly way and very considerate of Yoani–showed surprise at the extent and precision of the responses, such that when Yoani finished, the deputy, who continued to be amazed, rose from his seat and came to the table to shake hands with Yoani, offering her phrases of praise and solidarity. Senator Suplicy also spoke at the meeting, referring to the “bad time” in “Feria de Santana,” explaining that when he coordinated this session of Congress with Deputy Leite he sent a letter to the Cuban ambassador (he gave Yoani a copy of the letter to the Cuban ambassador inviting him to Congress that day) to ask him to come as a guest, with views of a “civilized” debate with “the blogger Yoani Sanchez,” something that the Cuban ambassador, with the arrogance that characterizes him, declined. Now in an institutional framework, civilized and politically high level, again Yoani scored 100 points.

On leaving the Congress, the characteristic battalion of journalists battalion confronted Yoani, who answered interesting questions about her future political ambitions.

“I hope to create a newspaper when I return to Havana. That’s my principal mission after this trip. I believe in the press as an effective fourth estate and my role in a democratic Cuba is journalism, to be able to freely criticize what I deem to be wrong. I dream of a Cuba where the president is one more personality in the national life. Not even the most important personality. I’m not political, I do not have sufficient cynicism to be political.” And with that Yoani capped a fundamental day.

(To be continued)

Articles by this author can be found at http://www.cubalibredigital.com

1 March 2013

The End of Chavez / Yoani Sanchez

Image taken from www.lahora.com.ec
Image taken from www.lahora.com.ec

It was a question of dates, of choosing a date on the calendar to announce what many of us had already imagined. The news of the Hugo Chavez’s death was produced on Tuesday afternoon, but for months his early end was predictable. The official Cuban media have maintained a version of his slow but increasing recovery, letting slip only in the last weeks the details of some complications. The matter was handled as a neat script, like a script written in the Plaza of the Revolution in Havana by two brothers who, with the death of their disciple from Miraflores Palace, have been left in a very delicate situation.

However, they could not delay they obituary any longer, because information is so hard to keep these days, like water in a bowl formed from two hands. So they finally found a day to tell the world the best kept secret in Cuba, comparable only to the secrecy surrounding the illness of Fidel Castro himself. Now comes the mourning, the black ribbons, the panegyrics over the deceased, but also beginning now is the airing of the incongruities between the published medical reports and the fatal outcome of the Comandante’s clinical situation. The lies will become more evident, the exaggerations will seem more coarse, and the bill for the truth will be passed to the Chavista leaders in Venezuela. The ancient Cuban leaders will also bear their share of responsibility for the lack of transparency with which they handled the convalescence of a foreign president treated in our country. Venezuelan citizens have the right to demand an explanation of how and when the death of their leader really occurred, and it remains to be seen if Raul Castro is disposed to give one.

6 March 2013

The Law and the Trap / Lilianne Ruiz

medicos-cubaAfter Decree-Law No. 302 went into force on January 14, health professionals in Cuba could now travel, at least in theory. However, in order to practice in the medical profession in other parts of the world one needs, logically, to be legally licensed in Cuba, in order to be recognized abroad, later. But the cost of this license, from Cuba’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs Legal Department, is $1,200 (U.S.), and the average monthly salary of a doctor in Cuba is 573 Cuban pesos, equivalent to about $25.

Tomas Rodriguez, a 43-year-old physician, has been invited by a friend to live and work in a foreign country. Tomas does not have his own home in Cuba, after 18 years of working in his profession. One of the expectations he had with this trip is that some day, if he decides to return, he can buy a house.

“I’m on the verge of despair. My friend is going to take care of my travel expenses and, at first, to give me housing. But this assumes that I should bring the title to practice my profession,” says Tomas.

The money required has the character of a “Tax.” The application for “Certification” costs 250 convertible pesos or cuc (more than $250 U.S.), and its legalization is 200 cuc. The request for your school records costs 350 cuc, and legal endorsement another 200 cuc. The General Medical degree can be had for just 200 cuc, because the person brings the document themselves and only needs to pay to have it legally endorsed, which costs the same for all documents. This is also true for other degrees from different specialties studied.

If Tomas comes to legalize the General Medical degree, he would prefer to renounce the other two specialties he has: “This opportunity isn’t going to last forever. Fortunately, they give you the degrees when you graduate. If I ask for a notarized school record for another purpose, they give it to me with a footnote that says it can only be used in the national territory,” he explains.

And he adds, “At least now we are free (in theory) to enter and leave the country. Assuming I could save my whole salary (24 cuc) without even spending 40 centavos for the bus, I would have to save nearly six years’ salary. No one can convince me that my education was free. In fact, I have  paid with these 18 years of public service as more than a doctor.”

We are accustomed to laws being promulgated in Cuba, by and from the State, which from the beginning don’t represent the interests of the citizens, so most people are not shocked by the price they have to pay for the legalizations of titles that support different professions. Simply, people try to get the money and then leave, as always, without protest.

All human migrations have the common denominator of struggling for life. Thomas concludes: “I don’t have 20 years. I can’t go and quit my profession. What am I going to live on, if the objective is to leave in order to work? They have recognized our right to travel, but only partially, there are still many obstacles and impediments like this.”

Lilianne Ruiz, Havana

4 March 2013

Angel Carromero Details Car Crash That Killed Oswaldo Paya and Harold Cepero

Angel Carromero speaking publicly in Cuba while still in custody of State Security.
Angel Carromero speaking publicly in Cuba while still in custody of State Security.

The Washington Post has published a lengthy interview with the Spaniard Angel Carromero where he details the events leading up to the crash that killed Oswaldo Paya and Harold Cepero, and what transpired afterwards.

The article can be read here.

Eating Out / Fernando Damaso

clip_image0021In Cuba, where the average monthly salary does not exceed 22 dollars (or 20 CUC), eating in restaurants, paladares and cafes amounts to a major economic sacrifice. They are out of reach for the average Cuban. Access is available only to a small number of people who can get in through legal, semi-legal or illegal means, or to resident foreigners and tourists. In other words, the number of potential clients (let’s not use the word “users”) is very limited, so both state-run and private restaurants compete to attract them.

State-run restaurants and cafes – with their characteristic inconsistency in quality, quantity, variety and level of service, not to mention their inflated prices – are the losers. Their employees spend most of the time worrying about the effect all the empty tables will have on their wallets.

In contrast private restaurants and cafes – generally noted for theirquality, quantity, variety, range of prices and good service, as well as their own unique identities – are the winners, packing people in both day and night. Things are not rosy for all of them, however. Some are only marginally successful, while others have had to close shortly after they opened due to financial problems. continue reading

Undoubtedly, those enjoying the greatest success have been establishments belonging to members of the Spanish and Chinese communities. They have been able to combine quality, quantity, variety, fair prices and good service with a pleasant atmosphere and unique style.

Close behind are those restaurants which have followed the same principles. These places always seem to be full and getting in to them can be difficult because of the high demand.

There are also some specialty restaurants – frequented primarily by members of the diplomatic corps and their guests, or by foreigners and tourists – which have maintained a culinary tradition going back many years.

In the rear you will find those places which, at great risk, have opted to go with so-called haute cuisine in a country in which the necessary suppliesfor this type of cooking, to say nothing of the potential clientele, are in short supply or do not exist. They stand empty, awaiting pending guests. Nevertheless, the variety is a healthy change, especially after years during which it was possible only to find “more of the same.”

Unfortunately, both state-run and private restaurants, paladares and cafes have begun imitating a practice common to other countries. They now routinely add an unfortunate “10% service charge” to the total bill as an obligatory tip. This ignores the healthy Cuban custom of allowing the customer to give the server a tip as a reward for good service. When not done as an obligation, it creates a degree of competitiveness among employees, raising the prestige of the restaurant. People seem to have adopted this undesirable practice, however, so I suppose we will have to learn to live with it.

Some private paladares and cafes, perhaps as a result of longstanding inertia, apply “socialist gastronomy management practices – cordoning off areas, halting service during a change in shift, charging for disposable containers to carry the food – without bearing in mind that with this option they are not offering table service, and they should amortize its cost, and announce lower prices on the menu items, which in reality are raised on having to pay for an accompaniment or garnish, added to a steak, pizza, or hamburger, just to name a few examples.

It is true that there are some, the few, priced in Cuban pesos (CUP), but the prices are equivalent in convertible pesos (CUC): It’s the same to pay seventy-two pesos (CUP) for a pizza or three convertible pesos (CUC). It’s just the same dog with a different collar.

There is no doubt that this whole culinary world here is very new, after half a century of its exercise being prohibited to individuals, but it would be advisable to set aside the schemes and focus on originality, both price and the quality of the dishes, which would be more competitive and, perhaps, help to increase the number of clients and ensure profitability, while not raising the purchasing power of ordinary citizens.

March 4 2013

Castro’s Moves: A Light, Tenuous, at the End of the Tunnel / Juan Juan Almeida

diaz-canelA February 24th with young talent, a breath of fresh air. Yesterday Cuba’s National Assembly of People’s Power ended its session, a session where new appointments were made: Homero Acosta as secretary of the Council of State; Gladys Bejerano as vice president of the Council; José Ramón Machado Ventura as controller general; Ramiro Valdés Menéndez; Lázara Mercedes López (first secretary of the Communist Party in Havana); and Salvador Valdés (general secretary of the Workers Union).

Ratified as members of this body were Inés María Chapman, Leopoldo Cintra, Abelardo Colomé, Guillermo García, Tania León, Álvaro López, Marino Murillo and Sergio Rodríguez.
They changed the facade, the membership of the Council of State now has 17 new members, something like reshuffling the deck. But I won’t dwell on them because the important thing is the investiture of “Compañero” Diaz-Canel as First Vice-president of Cuba, someone who many envision as the “promise of renewal and mutation.”

I want to share with you that Diaz-Canel, Miguel, or Miguelito–as he’s called in the closed circles which, to no one’s surprise, reelected the President of Cuba–has become the “number two” of the Revolutionary government not exactly for practicing the so-called hard line. continue reading

The unhealthy-looking fifty-something, recently named First Vice-president, is known as a prudent man; in public he speaks very little and smiles as necessary, knowing very well that in Cuba to shine is a sin.

An engineer by profession, he served in the armed forces, was a university professor and minister of education. Developed within the ranks of the Communist Party, he had a meteoric rise, for his notable intelligence. Those who know and belong to his circle of friends comment that he is inexpressive in matters of emotion, remains unperturbed facing a fire, a dolls funeral, or an open drawer. That is, he has the gift of ubiquity, being in the right place at the right time.

By way of gossip, mutual friends have told me that he like baseball, garlic fries, and from time to time, sotto voice conspiring against the government and, although he was “on the pajama plan”–that is temporarily ousted–for a mistake he made, he managed to vindicate himself after some self-flagellation, a sort of pathetic dramatization of Christ’s suffering, and his loyalty to power should not be taken as synonymous with dishonesty.

I think it’s too early to point to him as the future of Cuba strongman, I doubt that this appointment is the master key that can open the door of impregnable castle of the Knights Templar. That power, in our archipelago, for now remains invisible.

For me, the most meticulous and relevant of all this paraphernalia, closing the constituent session of the National Assembly of People’s Power of Cuba and the State Council, was that General Raul Castro spoke to legitimize his retirement and the death of Fidel. A light, tenuous, at the end of the tunnel.

February 27 2013

Yoani Sanchez: A Cuban Hurricane in Brazil (3) / Jorge Hernandez Fonseca

The despicable act in “Feria de Santana” was also executed against one of the most loved and respected senators, with the recognized militancy of the left.

By Jorge Hernandez Fonseca, Brasilia

If the repercussions of Yoani Sanchez’s coming to Brazil confirmed–according to the Brazilian press–the organization of the “acts of repudiation” by the Cuban embassy, materialized in the noisy welcome for Yoani at the Recife airport on the part of a little group in the pay of the Cuban ambassador (confirming the information in the magazine VEJA), then the attempted lynching in “Feria de Santana” by another claque brought from other cities in Bahia state, definitively settled Brazilian public opinion on the side of the frail and energetic Cuban.

The villainy of “Feria de Santana” was executed also against one of the most loved and respected senators among Brazilian politicians, Eduardo Suplicy, with recognized militancy on the left, the objects of insults and disrespect from the bloodthirsty mob. What happened was an act of unacceptable intolerance, not only against an supposed “CIA agent” blogger, as they wanted to see it, but an attempt by a foreign country (the Cuban government) to define the course of internal policy South American giant.

After the public presentation in “Feria de Santana,” Bahía, Brazil, which was meant to be a showing of the Brazilian filmmaker Dado Galvão’s documentary–an objective frustrated thanks to a band of protestors paid by the Cuban embassy in Brasilia– Yoani Sanchez’s
following presentations had the simple and only objective of hearing what she had to say about a wide range of topics, all focused on an island greatly loved by Brazilians of all stripes: Cuba. After that first night of intolerance, overcome by the courage of the blogger and the support of senator Suplicy, Yoani was offered dinner at the residence of one of the organizers of the activities in the city, where the Cuban blogger shared the evening with Senator Suplicy, an important participant in the acts of that day, founder and leading member of the Brazilian Labor Party, as is well-known. Yoani and Suplicy spoke at length. continue reading

The following day, Tuesday, February 19, Yoani made an appearance, in the morning, before the national and international press, attended by credentialed journalists only. At the end of the afternoon she would have a second presentation before students at a local University, that would be held with all the necessary security to guarantee the Cuban blogger’s participation in the event, without risking any physical attack.

Yoani Sanchez is a frail and frugal woman. During the dinner on Monday night, February 18, and the breakfast the next day, I saw that she “didn’t eat anything.” “Yoani, eat the meat, it’s delicious,” I told her during dinner. “I don’t care for meat, it’s that I’m not used to it.” At breakfast she didn’t even try the cafe con leche. “In Cuba I just breakfast on a little coffee.” A table covered in fruit, bananas among them, didn’t even grab her attention. And confirming the lies in the dossier prepared by the Cuban political police against her, she didn’t even drink beer during dinner, “I don’t care for it.” In reality, Yoani’s physical fragility is in part a product of her own physical build, but also a product of a deficient diet, not necessarily related to the scarcity of products, something comprehensible inside Cuba, but unexplainable outside. It’s a simple lack of being used to eating.

Yoani’s appearance before the press on Tuesday morning, the 19th, was normal. There were no protesters outside the auditorium where some 30-40 journalists waited to hear Yoani. The moderator of the activity requested, because there were many local and regional journalists, that the blogger’s responses be translated into Portuguese. As impromptu translator, I sat at the table with Yoani at the table on the dais, at a small local theater, where the audience consisted exclusively of journalists, videographers and photographers.

There were four themes that were repeated in almost all of Yoani’s public appearances, which also played in almost every interview she gave in Brazil: the U.S. embargo, “the 5″ spies imprisoned in the U.S., the Guantanamo naval base, and the sources financing for her long international trip. These questions, imposed by the agenda of the Cuban embassy and not by Yoani’s own, were the “main dish” of the previous day, to which was then added her alleged “membership in the American CIA,” which Yoani then dispatched with another question the rioters: “Do you believe that if the government of Cuba knows that I really ama CIA agent, I could move freely through Havana. ”

Yoani has responded on the embargo on more than 20 occasions with the following point of view: “I am against the embargo for three reasons: first, I consider it interference and detest all interference by a huge country in the affairs of a small country; second, I believe it is a ‘fossil of the cold war,’ that should be eliminated to move forward; and third, because the embargo is the savior of the Cuban government to justify its economic inefficiency, and now the complete scarcity of products and services is justified by blaming the embargo.” In the press conference she added, “The embargo is not an issue for us Cubans living on the Island; what is important inside Cuba is the embargo the government has against us, they have embargoed our freedom of expression, of association, of access to the Internet, among others.”

About “the 5” ‘Interior Ministry members’ (as Yoani qualifies) said: “let me tell you they were not 5, but 14 members of the Cuban Ministry of the Interior, U.S. prisoners inside while formed a spy network called’ Red Wasp ‘, 9 of them they made agreements with U.S. prosecutors and acknowledged their guilt, involving the five partners who would not make agreements, and therefore received longer sentences. No one is innocent.”

About the prison in Guantanamo Bay she said: “I am a Cuban activist who fights to defend the lack of freedoms of all kinds in Cuba; the Guantanamo prison, although it is in Cuba, is not a Cuban problem, it is American; I know that in the U.S. there are many activists fighting to close the Guantanamo prison, so they are different problems; they say there have been violations of human rights within the prison, well, I do not agree with the violation of human rights, in any place where they are violated.”

On the source of funding, she said: “My trip to Brazil was funded by a collection among Cubans living in Brazil and Brazilian friends of Dado Galvão (I am a witness to the collection, to which I put in 300 Reales, about 150 dollars), an account of which Galvão has posted transparently on his blog on the Internet.

My trip to Prague is funded by Amnesty International, because I was invited as a juror for a film festival they organized. I will go to Italy to collect an award that I had not been allowed to collect, which included–at that time–the plane ticket. From Italy I will go to Spain for the El Pais award, which also includes airfare. From Spain I go to New York, by invitation of students from two universities, which offer courses on computer science. From NY I will go to Miami to visit my sister, with airfare paid for with her money. From Miami I am going to Mexico to a meeting of the Inter American Press Association, IAPA, of which I am vice president (an office without pay, which Cuban propaganda reported erroneously) but they did pay for my ticket.

Early in the evening of Tuesday, the 19th, we prepared for another assault by the mob, at a function being held at a university. We were completely wrong. Yoani’s presentation was in a kind of sports venue, with dimensions somewhat larger than a tennis court, with an audience of two thousand college students, not to neglect the little group of 15-20 being paid by the embassy, with their posters, but not screaming, because the mass of 2,000 students present simply shut them up by whistling and a louder shout of repudiation.

Yoani and I sat on a relatively high stage, which protected us. The audience was seated in plastic chairs, with the first row a prudent distance from the platform, also for safety. It was tremendous. Yoani talked about her blog, her experience in computers, how she built a computer from old parts and how she dabbled in software to be able, herself, to mount her blog on the Internet.

Yoani and I sat on a relatively high stage, which protected us. The audience was seated in plastic chairs, with the first row a prudent distance from the platform, also for safety. It was tremendous. Yoani talked about her blog, her experience in computers, how she built a computer from old parts and how she dabbled in software to be able, herself, to mount her blog on the Internet.

In the Q&A session, several of the small group from the embassy were quick to take the floor to try to “create a crisis” for Yoani. The leader of the embassy employees asked the first question, for which he dragged out his introduction longer than necessary; really it was a harangue, with his back to Yoani and facing the audience. I, seated next to Yoani, interrupted and said to him, “What is your question, please?” He answered me something about he had to continue talking, and I said, “Look, the people here came to hear Yoani, not you.” I wanted to continue and say that his right was to ask a question with a reasonable introduction, but not to make speeches, but I couldn’t speak because the audience stood up and applauded my words telling him to ask his question. When the applause, and the repudiation of the embassy representative had died down, the young man wanted to continue his speech and the audience shut him up with a memorable booing. The question was from the same script as yesterday.

The best part was after the first three questions, asked by the small group of militants (which remained calm the whole time because of the adverse balance of forces). The rest of the questions came from students interested in learning from Yoani about Cuba, and almost always included an introduction criticizing extremists who harassed the blogger, also making references to the corruption scandals of the Brazilian leftist parties known as the mensualón [in reference to monthly payments made to legislators to vote with the ruling party]. They began to reverse the situation of Yoani, who shone brightly, answering multiple questions, always followed by a standing ovation. From that night onwards this was repeated in all public presentations.

(To be continued)

Jorge Hernández Fonseca

28 de Febrero de 2013

Prohibitions / Yoani Sanchez

museo_arte_modernoWhat is different? The smells and the temperature, I think at first. Then come the noises, so unique in each place, the grayness of the winter sky or the dark shade of the water in a river that runs through much of Europe. What, really, is new? I keep asking myself while trying a taste here, or shaking some hands, for the first time, there. The music perhaps, the sound of the tram braking at the stop, the snow piled up along the sidewalks, the spring flowers struggling to bloom even though the worst, perhaps, awaits them from the frost. Where is the strangeness? In the church bells that seem to compete at the marking of every hour, or in certain houses of such antiquity that seeing them makes the constructions in Old Havana look young.

But neither the profusion of modern autos, nor the WiFi signal that lets me connect to the Internet almost anywhere, are the real novelty for me. Nor are the kiosks full of newspapers, or the shops with bulging shelves, or the dog who, on the Metro subway platform is treated like the lord and master of the situation. The strange thing is not the friendliness of the clerks, the near absence of lines, the gargoyles with their claws and sharp teeth protruding from the walls, or the steaming wine that is drunk more to warm the body than to please the palate. None of these sensations, first-time or almost forgotten, over a decade without traveling, are what marks the difference between the Island I now see in the distance, and the countries visited on this occasion.

The principal contrast lies in what is and is not permitted. Since I got off the first plane I was expecting someone to scold me, someone to come out and warn me, “You can’t do that.” I look for the glance of the guard who will come to tell me, “Taking photos is not allowed,” the grim-faced cop who shouts at me, “Citizen! Identification,” the official who cuts off my passage while saying, “You can’t enter here.” But, I’m not about run into any of those characters so common in Cuba. So for me, the big differences are not the delicious seeded bread, the long-lost beef that now returns to my plate, or the sounds of another language in my ears. No. The big difference is that I don’t feel I’m permanently marked with the red badge of the outlaw, the whistle that surprises me in something clandestine, the constant sensation that whatever I do or think could be prohibited.

4 March 2013