A Military Unit Where One Can Find Young Men / Juan Juan Almeida

altoThe old Communist dogmas dictated that certain behaviors were seen as socially immoral actions. There are several testimonies of people interned in concentration camps were they tried to reeducate the so-called “Dispersed Sexual Addresses.” Loving someone of the same sex was a criminal act that entailed consequences and established punishments.

I will not write about a degrading “yesterday” that is restless when you dig into it. There are more than a few leaders who, knowing the power of weapons, especially when they point, decided to hide themselves and squeezed into a closet where social differences had no distinction. The prudish modesty of the barricaded closet just like the Caesars, Alexanders, conductors of the new path, and Moncada heroines.

But times change, the USSR died, and Socialist Camp came to an end, and the days of the Messiah Hugo Chavez appear to near their end, the Revolutionary eyes no longer see a certain enchantment in the battlefields and with an extravagant touch, perhaps something obscene, convert soldiers into magnets for investors.

The new Cuban fashion mixes the lines of pleasure, torture and humiliation, transforms martial units into sadomasochistic dungeons, and for discriminating tastes even arranges home delivery.

With a simple call to the military unit UM 1011 in its enclave south of Havana in the municipality of Managua you can receive, direct and with no additional cost, like Valkyrie stags of the gods, and with no fear of a glorious death for waiting the reward from the lewd pimp that is your fatherland: young recruits who will be willing to offer their noble and manly charms.

After hearing “at your service” on the other end of the line, you have to answer in code something like, “I need a green jacket for my blue passport.” That the recipient is free, does not mean that the dream is free, yet the clientele seems to increase.

The sad excuse of a human seems chilling to me. Incredible sincerity, unparalleled effrontery. A spiral of decadence, the degradation of the market, I would have to be very indolent not to want justice.

Military service in Cuba is obligatory, every young man on reaching 16 must go to the military office where he lives and register; not to do so is to subject himself to criminal law.

Now I repeat terribly convincing phrase of a “distinguished entrepreneur” who assured me he had been a casual user of this type of service, of official pandering: “There is no creature on earth who does not fight for survival. Cuba encourages the causes, and fights the consequences like someone who says close your eyes, hold out your hands, and open your mouth.”

February 10 2013

Citizen Demand for Another Cuba Distributed in Cienfuegos / For Another Cuba

Citizen Demand for Another Cuba Distributed in Cienfuegos

(Originally published in MartíNoticias)

Activists from the United Antitotalitarian Forum and the Reflection Movement distributed in Rodas Cienfuegos, more than two hundred copies of citizen demand For Another Cuba.

You can listen to former political prisoner and president of the Cuban Reflection Movement, Librado Linares here.

29 January 2013

Expo United Veto* tomorrow 2 February… / For Another Cuba

Next VETO UNITED*
Auspices #ForAnotherCuba
in alternative space ARRIBA VIVO YO

Led by Boris Glez., Luis Trapaga, Gorki Aguila y Claudio Fuentes

Tomorrow 2 Feb. 2012 at 5 pm in Emilio Nuñez 229 esq. 20 de mayo. Cerro, Havana

Obra "Fifo poetico" de Claudio Fuentes Madan
Work “Fifo poetico” by Claudio Fuentes Madan

*Translator’s note: A play on words; the official vote is called “Vote United”

1 February 2013

Campaign For Another Cuba Invites You to “A United Veto”* Collective Expo One Day Before the Elections / For Another Cuba

One day before the Cuban general elections to select the members of the Parliament and the provincial Assemblies of Popular Power…

724445721

February 2, 2013, at 5:00 pm at the alternative space Arriba Vivo Yo, led by Boris Glez., Luis Trapaga, Gorki Aguila and Claudio Fuentes.

Address: Emilio Nuñez 229 esq. 20 de mayo. Cerro.

¡CUBA CHANGES IF YOU WANT IT 3 FEBRUARY 2013!

*Translator’s note: A play on words; the official vote is called “Vote United”

30 January 2013

3,022 people signed the citizen demand For Another Cuba. Want to know why? / For Another Cuba

3022 people advocating for open debate signed citizen the Demand For another Cuba

WHY THE DEMAND?
As Cubans, legitimate children of this land and essential part of our Nation, we feel a deep sorrow for the prolonged crisis we live and the demonstrated inability of the current government to make substantive changes. This forces us from civil society, to seek and sue our own solutions.

We want a public debate about the dual currency in Cuba, the immigration restrictions, the rights of workers to a decent wage, the right of all Cubans, wherever they live, to promote economic initiatives in their own country, about our demographic crisis, the free access to Internet and new technologies. We want to debate on the exercise of democracy.

10 February 2013

A Spear for Angel / Luis Felipe Rojas

dmimg_00972
The novelist Daniel Morales

The literary desert that Miami was considered to be a few years ago is ending. On Friday night, February 8, the La Otra Esquina de las Palabras (The Other Corner of Words) hosted Daniel Morales who presented his novel La casa del sol naciente (The House of the Rising Sun) (Homagno 2011).

Among the fragments of his minimalist prose and the winks at a phantom country everyone associates with Cuba, we can discover a narrator with the strength to tell the truth, enter the premises of the imagination and create for us a world of realities that belongs to us for having lived it or having lost it forever in exile, disillusionment and the death of hope. La casa… finds its breeding grounds in those atrocious years of the 70s and 80s, the marginalization and the institutionalized repression against anything that smelled “foreign.” It is a well constructed narrative body and only someone with Daniel’s patience can go so far… and so well.

La Otra Esquina de las Palabras is a gift to us from the poet Joaquín Gálvez, a place for book lovers and bohemian Miami. Located in the courtyard of Café Demetrio, Joaquin specified that the night was dedicated to the writer Angel Santiesteban, who is in Cuba with the terror of the sword of Damocles hanging over his head.

Any afternoon a little man dressed in blue might appear to nicely ask him to accompany him to the dungeons to serve his five-year sentence.

The reason? In the absence of evidence, the withdrawn charges by his accusing ex-wife, and the testimony before the cameras of a false witness, a police expert decided that Angel’s handwriting, the slant of his letters, revealed that he was lying.

On the night of February 8, the fiery words of Idabel Rosales, and the presence of Santiesteban’s sister and his friends was an act of human solidarity. The results of the sale of the book have been sent to Angel, and more, according to those closest to him.

A couple of years ago when this odyssey began an excellent Cuban narrator said something like: “They say that Angel is the center of attention,” which then was only rumors. Now the fire has grown and consumed not only his house but those of all who believe ourselves to be his friends, needing only to rise within the voices of those who accompanied him to literary soirees, to the projects to find young writers, and those who believed they could constitute a learned republic with room for all: those who applaud without being asked and the restless, those who already make up a long blacklist.

Joaquin Galvez
From left to right, Aimara Perez, Angel Santiesteban’s sister, and the promoter Idabel Rosales
Joaquin Galvez introduces Daniel
Joaquin Galvez introduces Daniel

All photos by Luis Felipe Rojas

February 9 2013

A New Trial for Angel Santiesteban / Lilianne Ruiz

Lilianne Ruiz, Angel Santiesteban, Yoani Sanchez, Lia Villares
Lilianne Ruiz, Angel Santiesteban, Yoani Sanchez, Lia Villares – Taken in Yoani’s apartment

I always remember from Oedipus: I am a toy in the hands of destiny. Maybe the life of Angel Santiesteban, prominent Cuban writer and opposition blogger, is also marked by that concept. But the Kafkaesque style of totalitarian societies where fatum is a metaphor for the State, has to be taken into account.

Making the apology that friends usually make would detract from the objectivity of this article, and would not be taken into account by the readers. What I am going to try to show is that in his trial there are evident arbitrary procedures that yield as a consequence an extremely severe sentence for a crime that was not sufficiently proven.

Last January 15 the Supreme Court denied the appeal by Santiesteban’s lawyer; without responding to the doubts that led to the filing of the Appeal under the grounds set forth by current Cuban law, which were not recognized in the final ruling of the Supreme Tribunal.

One must remember that it is the mother of the writer’s son who initiated the suit for “unlawful entry” and “injuries.” But she changed her statement four times, and if she could not damage him more it was because her main witness “after having testified in police headquarters, agreed to make a home video, which is in the file, where he alleged that he lied under the guidance of the plaintiff, who made promises of personal benefits,” as stated in the appeal documents.

The defense witnesses were dismissed by the Chamber, in spite of the fact that “after having been advised to tell the truth and of the criminal penalty for failing to do so,” they swore that on “the day of the events, July 28, 2009, at the time in question, Santiesteban was to be found in a different place and distant from the home of the complainant.”

Santiesteban’s younger son testified that his father was not at his home on the day on which the events supposedly took place. But that does not disprove, but rather corroborates, the statement of the two people who testified that on July 28, 2009, between noon and 6 pm, Santiesteban was with them, so that he could not have committed the crime of which he was accused, or it can’t be proven; as it also is true that he was not at home with his son.

Yahima Lahera, a teacher at and director of the primary school of Angel Santiesteban’s son, testified that the boy confessed to her that his mother made him make statements that incriminated his father.

According to the defense attorney, Lic. Miguel Iturria Medina, proper use of the Penal Code was not made because a sanction for the crime “unlawful entry” was imposed that exceeds by a year the maximum limit provided for by the Code. And as far as the crime of “injuries,” the maximum sanction was applied without having proved the causal relationship, and once again, without the presence of the accused at the place of the events having being sufficiently proven.

Santiesteban’s attorney also said: “We believe that the chamber has rejected all exculpatory evidence and welcomed, against the accused, every detail detrimental to him, in order to arrive at an extreme judgment that leaves him defenseless.”

May these words serve as a call to international public opinion asking that, as stated in the Appeal, Angel Santiesteban is entitled to have all the errors and obscurities that his lawyer has discovered heard, and because of which he has petitioned for the sentence to be nullified in order to hold, in the future, a more objective process.

Angel Santiesteban has received several national and international recognitions such as the Juan Rulfo Mention Award of 1998, the UNEAC award in 1995, the Cesar Galeano Award in 1999, the Alejo Carpentier Award in 2001, and the House of the Americas Award in 2006. He is also author of the blog The Children Nobody Wanted.

Translated by mlk

8 February 2013

Is the Havana Cigar a Product for Cubans / Yoani Sanchez

6a00d8341bfb1653ef017d40ea76c3970c-550wiMy grandfather chewed tobacco, biting down on it and moistening it with his saliva in an obsessive ritual that continued throughout the day. He also had a pipe, to which he added the coarse-cut tobacco he prepared himself, which he smoked only after meals. He belonged to the generation that grew up watching the most famous Hollywood stars smoking on the big screen and he imitated them from his seat in the movie theater. My grandfather didn’t look anything like a Humphrey Bogart with his irresistibly gallant cigarettes in Casablanca; nor a Marlon Brando enveloped in nicotine-filled smoke and sensuality. Because, unlike those glamorous men, Basilio Eliseo was a surly islander with calloused hands incapable of writing a full sentence. But he did share, with such famous characters, the enjoyment of a good cigar. The aroma that emanated — I can almost smell it now — was a mixture of sweat and nicotine, which hung in the air for hours after he’d left.

For Cubans, who still enjoy Havana cigars, it has become difficult to satisfy this preference. The market that operates in convertible pesos has absorbed most of a production that now trades at stratospheric prices in specialized luxury stores. Before the astonished eyes of passersby, whose monthly salaries barely exceed twenty-five dollars, the windows display boxes of the Romeo y Julieta brand for the a year’s salary, or a single Cohiba for a month’s wages. The offering of puros for sale in national money, at a price accessible to locals, is practically extinct. In part because the astute traders of the illegal market have captured the supply; they change the bands and sell them to the tourists as higher quality products. But also because the State has lost interest in selling to their own citizens a product they prefer to export, in order to earn juicier profits.

However, beyond commercial or even medical considerations, the truth is that the image of the old Cuban man with a puro between his lips is becoming a thing of promotional posters and commercial advertising. Neither a retiree nor an active professional — whatever their specialty — can afford to buy quality cigars at a price that bears some relation to their legal income. Thus, a national product has become an international one, a symbol of Cuban identity transformed into a trophy for visiting foreigners. Except for the growers who reserve some leaves for their and their family’s own consumption, ever fewer compatriots can choose this type of “smoke.” And it is not about defending, now, a habit harmful to the lungs and prejudicial to the pocketbook; but about recognizing that the so-called Havana cigar is no longer a product for those who live on the island, contrary to what many foreigners believe. The picture of my grandfather Elisha chewing the leaves or tamping the shredded tobacco into his pipe, is just that… an image full of anachronisms from those long ago days.

10 February 2013

Happy Anniversary, Camaguey / Henry Constantin

camagey-desde-iglesia-del-sagrado-coraznThis time I will talk about Camagüey, after many trips to my city, trips that are always of return and obligatory because with it, without my neighborhood of La Vigia, without the alleys, the dilapidated rail, the vibrant Republica Street, the thousand church domes bowing to the heavens wherever you look, the Casino Campestre park, the most insistent love poems in the world — courting Dolores Rondon even after her burial — and the statue of Ignacio Agramonte showing me how a man must walk, without all this, I can’t live.

And I speak of Camagüey because the State, always the State, is celebrating its 499 years — even though history says it’s not so — and because there are brave people and brilliant artists there, confirmed lately, in the midst of so much exile by plane or of the soul.

What we from Camagüey celebrate this week is the founding of Santa María del Puerto del Principe — which did not happen in February 1514, but in the summer of the following year — in a remote part of the north coast, tens of miles from the current city. At the site of today the great-great-grandparents of our great-great-grandparents didn’t come to live until January 1528, so we are celebrating 23 years in advance.

But there is little point in showing off so many centuries with no reasons, if the local people live disgusted with their reality, sheltered in their corners, disinterested in or fearful of what happens outside their walls, or having lost faith that life will be better tomorrow.

There is not much to celebrate when some children stand in endless lines to get a passport and leave, and others elude the gaze of the coastguard to launch themselves on the sea. Not when there are the poorest of slums, prisons, pockets and stomachs, leaving such a sad echo.

Rather, these are reasons for the city, between the music and the beer, to stop a moment and say, loudly, “This has to change now.”

And to scream it at every corner, like at the 1514 Restaurant — what a symbolic place to celebrate Camaguey’s birthday — where some guys, this February 1, some guys filled the air with shouts of “Long live human rights!” and “Down with…” before being overwhelmed by State Security.Without even knowing them I like these people who protest, simply for taking the risk of saying loudly and in the city center what thousands of Cubans whisper, with fear and hesitation.

Because Camaguey was always marked on the map of Cuba for its women and men of rebellious and lofty heart, for Joaquin de Aguero being first to free his slaves, Ignacio Agramonte of the army, Ana Betancourt and Amalia Simoni taking to the jungle not to look in the faces of the henchmen making themselves comfortable in the city, Ignacio Mora publishing his paper even from the Nasaja caves where he could share his ideas without pay.

In Camagüey all Cespedes desires for command ended, in Camagüey Huber Matos from Manzanillo found a quorum to tell him Communism was his boss, Camilo Cienfuegos left Camagüey with his head full of different ideas and was never heard from again, in Camagüey… In Camagüey.

On February 2, the Day of our Lady of Candelaria — Camagüey’s patroness — when the city began its anniversary party, some very kind and loving officers dragged me from my house, with cops and without the law, and hid me in an office for four hours to try to terrorize me, to try to buy me — “every man has his price” and I answered “mine is a free Cuba” — trying to dirty me, even grabbing me to receive their effusive kisses and hugs, the more they tried and tried in vain, so naive, it only made me laugh inside. Such desperation in them made me think about their fears.

Two days later, at City Hall, in front of the picture of the Commander-in-Chief diffuse and decomposing on a podium, I smiled again. Maybe next year, for the five hundredth birthday, Camagüey will feel more free. May the Virgin of Candelaria hear us and help us.

February 7 2013

Lack of Staying Power / Yoani Sanchez

nuestro-deber-es-vencer
Our Duty is to Overcome

The elevator is a concentration of odors at all hours. When fish arrives at the ration market it’s impregnated with a strong smell of mackerel for days. The man who sells homemade pizzas on the upper floors leaves his aromas, as do the colonies of babies whose mothers take them out for a walk. Sometimes there is a sweet fragrance, most intense, that sticks to the clothes of those who rise and fall in the small metal cabin. Everyone knows it’s the strong effluvium from a flirtatious neighbor who seems to “bathe” herself in colognes and creams every time she goes out into the street. So the joke of the day is to refer to the “tremendous staying power of her perfumes…” A phrase also used outside the context of cosmetics and creams to indicate when the effect of something is strong and long-lasting.

Well, our entire reality lacks staying power. A service is inaugurated today and four weeks later it already begins to lose quality and is restricted. They announce with great fanfare the expansion of train departures or an improvement in bus frequencies, but a few months later everything returns to what it was before. They open the doors of new cultural or recreational institutions and barely half a year later they fall off the cliff for lack of supplies and deterioration. Maintaining standards is an impossibility, even for many self-employed workers who seem to have inherited the State sector’s propensity to decline. Popular wisdom advises using or visiting certain places within the first 72 hours of their opening, because later… nothing will be the same.

The lack of staying power extends from architectural restorations — that will soon have damaged paint from the humidity and leaks in the roof — to bureaucratic procedures which only work efficiently on the first day. Ephemerality marks our pace, transience is the fate of quality in Cuba. Proof of this are the services provided by our post offices and banks. Every now and then, there are reports of administrative transformations to make then efficient, but the improvements don’t last. The time is takes for us to learn about an advance is enough for it to evaporate. Like a ephemeral artwork — or a cheap perfume — the advances often fade without our ever having time to realize they existed.

9 February 2013

Cuba in 2020: A Hypothetical Portrait / Rosa Maria Rodriguez

Dear blog reader:

The essay published here is an expanded version of one I submitted to a competition sponsored by Diario de Cuba in which each entrant had to describe in 1,500 words or less what he or she believed Cuba would look like in 2020. Although I earned “not even a stick of gum” for this effort, I am posting it here because I want to share it with my “accomplices,” my regular visitors and the acquaintances who found this blog “barefoot and hairless in writing.” I hope you like it.

Sincerely,

Rosamaría

Cuba in 2020: A Hypothetical Portrait

It is only eight years until 2020, and while I personally do not like to make predictions, this is an essay, so I will pretend to have 20/20 foresight in order to prognosticate and sketch out the socio-political and economic outlines of Cuba at that time.

In 2020 Cuban society will perhaps have broken through some of the cellophane constraining people’s rights, but will still not enjoy all of the fundamental freedoms essential for human dignity and the common good. Eight years is not very long to repair this canvas faded by the inclement weather of neglect and blurred by the helplessness brought on by injustice. continue reading

For more than five decades, the Cuban regime has been coming up with weak arguments for the long list of prohibitions, violations of human rights and the unjust laws which it has imposed on society. These pretexts, while publicly supported by a segment of our fellow citizens who have felt obliged to feign approval in order to fit in and survive, have been indefensible for some time.

Thanks to Missile Crisis of the early 1960s, generated largely by the governments of Cuba and the Soviet Union (USSR), the Revolution’s then young leadership benefitted from an agreement between the United States and the USSR in which the former agreed not to attack Cuba.

During this entire time successive American administrations have abided by and respected this agreement in spite of the hostile rhetoric coming from one or more of them. The effect has been to untie the hands of Cuba’s longtime leaders, leaving them free to intervene in the world’s many conflicts while demanding the opposite of society and its political/military structure.

This demagogic game relies on a convenient enemy always ready to attack us — the wolf from Aesop’s fable — which has provided them with a permanent hold on power unprecedented throughout the world and in the Caribbean archipelago.

Dictatorial bosses are resisting change because they do not want to lose “their non-aristocrat’s aristocratic privileges.” This basically becomes an imperative for them since they lack alternatives and risk losing their jobs. Because the results of their governance have been so disastrous, they also want to exonerate their families of responsibility by placing them in ever more important and lucrative positions, which will give them widespread and visible recognition.

But since this is not a history lesson but rather a prediction about the future in the very short span of eight years, I will begin by giving some clues as to what I believe our country will look like in 2020.

It is very likely that by then the architects of the Cuban model will no longer be around. Because of political and ideological inertia, personnel changes and vested interests, however, their influence may live on in the positions traditionally held by their loyal and well-established cohorts, friends and family members.

The possible composition of this “Cuban landscape” will be subject to certain variables, such the presence, or lack thereof, of some of the ultra-conservative historical personalities who share responsibility for creating this system, a reconciliation with the Cuban diaspora, and the normalization of relations with the United States.

For a very long time the Cuban government has maintained the ruse that US policy towards our country corrals them, forcing them to impose draconian laws which violate people’s fundamental rights and deplete our resources. This “historical portrait” omits mention of the property that was expropriated from Cuban citizens and American companies, as well as the people on whose property rights they trampled and which today are being reaffirmed because of the economic disaster that has destroyed Cuba.

Additionally, the flood of influences, cloaked in the mask of solidarity, overwhelmed the economic capacity of this small country. Everything they exchanged for international support to justify their violations of human rights and lack of civil and political freedoms burdened us with debt and led to financial ruin.

We know that the traditional policy of Cuban authorities has fundamentally imbued American administrations with the colors and textures of blame for the disasters which have befallen our homeland. Their ethical reasoning has exposed the aesthetic of eluding responsibility, of taking the easy way out, by pointing their brush at the neighbor with the largest palette beyond our northern shores.

But what have Cuban authorities done to encourage an improvement in relations with the nearby giant? Many of the conditions which gave rise to the disagreements between both states still endure and are maintained willingly by the two parties. The same self-portrait endures, with Cuba’s steadfast refusal to join the chorus of the world’s other democratic countries.

They relapse by supporting those states which have marked differences with the United States, and subsist on the dilated “pointillism” of time. Their hostile rhetoric makes any understanding or possibility of dialog between the two governments impossible.

Similarly, the authorities maintain an antagonism with the Cuban diaspora – principally those in the United States. Why are they concerned about defending the human rights of other countries’ citizens while they violate the rights of their own? It is not ethical to try to normalize relations with our neighbor if we are not capable of fixing the problems we have within our own national home. Any process leading to the normalization of relations must begin with the reconciliation of all the children of our common home.

Most importantly, it is with our emigres that Cuban totalitarianism must reconcile since it is they who have suffered the most from injustices committed in the past and whose rights have been violated in a sustained way for more than fifty Januaries.

They are also the nationals who will have to be first called upon to invest on our native soil. Why have Cuban authorities looked to foreign investment, now principally American capital, to solve their economic problems? What about the financial wealth of our compatriots living in other latitudes? In eight years time we must resolve the issue of participation by Cubans living overseas in the economic development of Cuba, who are linked to those of us living on the island. Though we have been decapitalized for more than half a century, we still possess cognitive abilities.

By 2020 we should see more freedoms and the reform of unjust laws imposed by the dictatorial Cuban regime. The foundations and “highlights” are in the past and the present, in everything that we, as Cuba’s alternative civil society, have proposed and whose initiatives, adjusted to suit their interests, the authorities are currently adopting.

Their success depends on the will of Cuba’s leaders to “draft” what is necessary to obtain an increasingly harmonious cohabitation with Cuban natives, economic expansion and participation on the part of Cuban nationals living overseas, who could serve as the most effective mediators or negotiators in the process of normalizing relations with the United States.

In eight years Cuban leaders should have already have “sketched out” an irreversible transition towards recognition of rights such as respect for the property rights of its citizens, which has been one of the sore points of the Cuban situation. The long-delayed redrafting of a new, pluralistic Constitution is essential for any desired democratic outcome, and must form a part of future leaders’ political “outline.”

Perhaps in 2020 our streets will still have potholes, but we will be working towards changing or eliminating obstacles to the main objective, which should be the prevailing goal for our children — national reconciliation and rebuilding the country.

The best “portrait” we Cubans could give ourselves would be for those who hold power in have Cuba to ratify the United Nations’ Convention on Civil, Political and Economic Rights as the first “brushstroke” in beginning to regain our civil liberties.

If the rulers take necessary steps urgent for our society, which by that time will be legalized political alternatives, we will be able to freely express ourselves and freely associate according to our pigments or ideological colors. For now, I prefer to imagine that we will have the power to draw a mural without splintering for lack of freedoms and rights; in which we will paint ourselves as a perfectible society that will continue indefinitely seeking the most just paths for all the members of our nation.

January 31 2013